Software Engineering Insights

Many companies struggle to make their AI initiatives work, despite investing heavily in high-end technologies and hiring top-tier talent, only to see no ROI delivered as expected. According to Gartner's prediction, 85% of AI implementations are likely to fail due to the absence of a solid data strategy.

Ever launched a product thinking everything was on point, only to have a bug slipping in that no one saw coming? You’re not alone. 

In fact, according to a recent research by Gitnux, 70% of bugs are reported post-release, highlighting limited test coverage.

Now, in 2025, the testing landscape has undergone major changes. Alongside tried and tested methods like manual testing, regression testing, and automated scripts, we’re seeing the rise of something new: AI agents. 

It’s a situation many tech leaders eventually encounter: a business-critical application is running, but the source code is either missing, broken beyond comprehension, or too outdated to be useful. You’re left with an interface that works, but a backend that no one fully understands. No documentation. No clean code. No clear path forward.

What if you could still rebuild the entire application, its interface, functionality, and structure using nothing more than a screenshot or a screen recording?

Autonomous agents are no longer a research concept; they are being deployed to handle complex, multi-step workflows across tools, departments, and even entire business units. From automating software engineering tasks to accelerating product research or managing multi-channel operations, agentic AI frameworks are powering a new class of systems that can reason, plan, and take actions with minimal human intervention.

Even after crossing the beta testing phase, QA teams find themselves stuck in long testing cycles, putting in tens of hours of manual effort before the software or a feature is ready for release. At this point, quality assurance becomes more than a checkpoint; it is the deciding factor between a successful launch that entices users and one that is forgotten.

According to a report by Gitnux, Enterprises using AI for testing have reduced their test script maintenance efforts by 65%, resulting in faster releases and more dependable software. 

As AI becomes deeply embedded in everything from national security to healthcare and education, a new question is arising: Who really controls the artificial intelligence that is shaping our future? That’s where Sovereign AI enters the conversation. It’s not just a technical term; it is a growing movement among nations to build and own AI systems that reflect their values, protect their data, and reduce reliance on foreign tech giants. 

Artificial intelligence is stepping into a new phase, one where it doesn’t operate in isolation, but in collaboration. As real-world problems grow more complex and dynamic, there’s a growing shift toward AI systems that think, act, and adapt collaboratively. That’s where multi-agent AI systems come in: networks of intelligent agents that work together, often with competing or complementary goals to solve problems that a single AI simply can’t handle alone.

AI is no longer an abstract concept in healthcare, from accelerating diagnostics and optimizing treatment plans to enhancing operational workflows and patient engagement. Yet, not every AI innovation delivers equal value.

According to a report by Gitnux, the global AI‑in‑healthcare market is projected to grow from $45.2 billion in 2026 to $188 billion by 2030.

While some technologies are already reshaping clinical practices, others remain in experimental stages or are overhyped with minimal real-world impact. 

Some decisions in AI system design may seem minor at first glance, but can have a lasting impact; one such choice is between building a stateful or stateless AI agent. While the difference may seem technical on the surface, it has a strong influence on how your system responds, learns, and scales over time. Whether you're working on a simple query-response bot or a complex, context-aware assistant, the architecture you choose can shape the entire user experience. 

AI agents are becoming more capable and more unpredictable. From misinterpreting user intent to generating inaccurate or biased responses, even well-trained agents can behave inconsistently once deployed. Traditional QA approaches often fall short because AI agents don’t just process logic; they interpret language, context, and nuance. That’s why testing them requires more than checking for bugs; it demands evaluating behavior, adaptability, and failure modes.